Open-source Unified Observability Platform: If you like where we’re headed, star Parseable on GitHub and help us build.Star on GitHub
Parseable

10 Best Open-Source Unified Observability Platforms in 2025

D
Debabrata Panigrahi
September 17, 2025
10 Best Open-Source Unified Observability Platforms in 2025

Introduction: Why “Unified Observability” Matters in 2025

Observability costs are up. Dashboards are multiplying. Teams want a unified, open-source observability platform that handles logs, metrics, and traces (and increasingly events/profiles) without vendor lock-in or runaway spend. This buyer’s guide cuts through the noise with a pragmatic ranking of the top options in 2025, anchored in scale, total cost of ownership (TCO), and day-2 operations.

This 2025 guide catalogs ten open-source platforms that organizations rely on today. We emphasize how they store data, how you query and correlate signals, and the operational trade-offs, so you can pick a solution that fits your scale, skill sets, and budget.

Below is a deeper, buyer-grade drill-down for each platform. For consistency, each entry includes: Architecture & signals, Core strengths, Watch-outs, and Quick start tips you can use in a 1–2 week pilot.

Top 10 Open Source Unified Observability Platforms in 2025

1. Parseable

Official Website: parseable.com License: AGPLv3

Architecture & signals: Object-storage-first (S3/GCS/Azure/MinIO) with columnar Parquet for logs/events and unified SQL-first querying across logs, metrics, and traces. Diskless, horizontally scalable ingest; built for real-time + historical analysis without hot disks. Unified platform targeting logs/metrics/traces with a “single-binary feel,” SQL-like queries, and OTel compatibility. Storage on object/disk depending on mode.

Core strengths

Parseable Explore Page

  • Lowest-possible TCO at scale: Columnar compression + object storage lifecycle rules (tiering/retention) curb costs for multi-TB/day pipelines.
  • Unified query surface: Correlate logs↔traces↔metrics with SQL (joins, filters, time windows) instead of juggling multiple query dialects.

Parseable Ingest Page

  • High-cardinality resilience: Columnar layout and predicate pushdown reduce wasteful scans vs. index-heavy row stores.
  • Operational simplicity: Stateless ingest + object store means fewer moving parts; easy to run in K8s or VM fleets.

Watch-outs

  • Some advanced UI/AI features may be enterprise-only; track roadmap/release notes.
  • If you’re coming from index-heavy stacks, expect a brief query-shape learning curve (write fewer regexes, more selective SQL).

Quick start tips

  • Pilot: Dual-write a noisy microservice + K8s control-plane metrics for 14 days.
  • KPIs: Query P95 (<1–2s on common filters), storage $/TB-month (with 30–90d retention), and operator burn (hours/week).
  • Schema hygiene: Normalize keys (service, env, trace_id) and add lightweight enrichment at ingest.

2. Grafana LGTM

Official Website: grafana.com License: Core projects Grafana, Loki, Tempo and Mimir are AGPLv3; Pyroscope server is AGPLv3 (client integrations remain Apache-2.0).

Architecture & signals: Loki (logs), Grafana (UI), Tempo (traces), Mimir (metrics), plus Pyroscope (profiles). Each system scales independently; Grafana unifies visualization, alerting, SLOs.

Grafana LGTM Architecture

Core strengths

  • Breadth & community: Massive plugin ecosystem, great dashboards, contact points across infra/app layers.
  • Battle-tested primitives: Prometheus-compatible metrics, Tempo for OTel traces, Loki for cost-aware log storage.
  • Flexibility: Mix and match backends; storage backends commonly include object stores for cost control.

Watch-outs

  • Operational complexity: Four+ backends to size, scale, patch, and back up; cross-product upgrades and retention policies take discipline.
  • Multi-dialect queries: PromQL, LogQL, Tempo/TraceQL—powerful but context-switch heavy.

Quick start tips

  • Pilot: Use your existing Prometheus → Mimir, OTel Collector → Tempo, and ship logs to Loki.
  • Sane defaults: Start with global labels discipline; pre-build a few SLO dashboards to evaluate usefulness, not just look-and-feel.

3. ClickStax

ClickStax is a new offering after ClickHouse acquired HyperDX.

Official Website: clickhouse.com/clickstack License: Apache License 2.0

Architecture: An open-source, ClickHouse-powered full observability stack that ships out-of-the-box support for logs, metrics, traces, and session replay. It pairs a ClickHouse backend (columnar, compressed, vectorized) with a HyperDX-built UI that understands wide events, offers natural-language querying, alerting, and an OTel-native ingest path.

Core strengths: ClickStack lowers the barrier to “Observability 2.0” (wide-event, SQL-based observability) for teams that don’t want to hand-roll schemas, dashboards, and collectors on top of ClickHouse. You get fast search + fast aggregations over high-cardinality data without stitching multiple siloed stores.

Watch-outs:

  • Turnkey OTel pipeline (collector → ClickHouse) with default schemas for L/M/T; bring-your-own schema when you need.
  • Wide-event UI: NL queries, trace↔log correlation, session replay, and features like event deltas to surface regressions quickly.
  • Elastic scale: Storage/compute separation (object storage), plus compute-compute separation for dedicated ingest vs. query pools.
  • Semi-structured JSON support in ClickHouse with automatic column creation/type promotion for evolving telemetry.
  • Open source first; designed to run self-hosted or on ClickHouse Cloud.

Quick start tips: Follow the Getting Started guide, dual-write a noisy service for 14 days, and compare P95 query latency, $/TB-month, and ops hours/week against your current stack.

4. HyperDx

Official Website: hyperdx.io License: MIT

Architecture & signals: Primarily logs + traces with session replay and app-debugging workflows; OSS backend with self-host option.

HyperDx Architecture

Core strengths

  • App troubleshooting: Fast repro via replay, trace-linked logs, and error focus.
  • Dev velocity: Shortens MTTR by making “what just happened?” obvious.

Watch-outs

  • Metrics depth: If you need PromQL-grade infra metrics, plan to pair with a metrics backend.
  • Governance: Review RBAC/multi-tenant needs for larger orgs when self-hosting.

Quick start tips

  • Pilot: Instrument a user-facing service; validate you can jump from a 500 in logs → the exact user/session → the specific trace within seconds.

5. OpenSearch Observability

Official Website: opensearch.org License: Apache License 2.0

Architecture & signals: OpenSearch + Observability/Trace Analytics plugins for logs/metrics/traces, visualized in OpenSearch Dashboards. ILM for index lifecycle.

OpenSearch Observability Architecture

Core strengths

  • Familiarity: If you’re already running OpenSearch, adding observability can be incremental.
  • Search power: Lucene-style queries and dashboards suit teams with deep search habits.
  • ILM: Mature index lifecycle and rollover controls.

Watch-outs

  • Ops heaviness: JVM tuning, shard count, heap sizing, and snapshot management get intricate.
  • Cost creep: Hot shards and replicas can quietly balloon storage and compute.

Quick start tips

  • Pilot: Put hot logs on shorter hot phases + object store snapshots; implement strict index templates to control mapping drift.

6. Apache SkyWalking

Official Website: skywalking.apache.org License: Apache License 2.0

Architecture & signals: Tracing powerhouse with service map intelligence; bridges for metrics and logs via pluggable storage (e.g., Elasticsearch/OpenSearch, BanyanDB). Strong mesh/eBPF story.

SkyWalking Architecture

Core strengths

  • Service-mesh clarity: Excellent at showing relationships, dependencies, and latency paths.
  • Tracing depth: Rich span data, topology, and segment analysis.
  • eBPF/mesh integrations: Insight without invasive code changes.

Watch-outs

  • Unified maturity: Logs/metrics often come via adapters; ensure the “single-pane” experience meets your bar.
  • Storage choice matters: Backing store selection shifts cost/perf characteristics.

Quick start tips

  • Pilot: Focus on a microservices slice behind a service mesh; confirm trace-to-log correlation patterns you’ll standardize.

7. VictoriaMetrics Stack (VM + VictoriaLogs)

Official Website: victoriametrics.com License: Apache License 2.0

Architecture & signals: VictoriaMetrics for time-series metrics (remote-write compatible) + VictoriaLogs for logs; pair with Tempo/Jaeger for traces and Grafana for UI.

VictoriaMetrics Architecture

Core strengths

  • Metrics at scale, cheaply: Highly efficient storage/ingest; a favorite for Prometheus consolidation.
  • Composable “unified”: Add logs and traces with well-known companions; keep costs predictable.
  • Ops-friendly: Simple deployment, clear resource curves.

Watch-outs

  • DIY integration: You’ll stitch traces (Tempo/Jaeger) and visualization (Grafana) yourself.
  • Logs maturity: Evaluate VictoriaLogs at your expected cardinality and retention; validate search ergonomics.

Quick start tips

  • Pilot: Migrate a Prometheus remote-write stream to VM; add VictoriaLogs for application logs and Tempo for traces; test cross-links in Grafana.

8. Pixie

Official Website: pixie.dev License: Apache License 2.0

Architecture & signals: eBPF-based auto-telemetry for Kubernetes clusters (HTTP, SQL, DNS, CPU/memory insights, etc.) with rich live views and a scripting layer (PxL). Typically paired with a backend for long-term storage.

Pixie Architecture

Core strengths

  • Zero-touch visibility: Immediate insights without code changes—fantastic for cluster triage.
  • Live debugging: High-fidelity, short-retention data is perfect for “right now” firefights.
  • Developer empathy: Quick wins for SREs and app teams in K8s.

Watch-outs

  • Retention: Designed for short-term/live data; plan exports for historical analysis.
  • Scope: You’ll still want a persistent backend to unify logs/metrics/traces over months.

Quick start tips

  • Pilot: Install Pixie on a staging cluster; verify scripts that surface N+1 calls, TLS issues, or payload anomalies; export key views into your long-term store.

9. Observatorium

Official Website: observatorium.io License: Apache License 2.0

Architecture & signals: A multi-tenant, centralized backend/API layer that unifies metrics/logs/traces via composable components (e.g., Thanos/Loki/Tempo-style stores) with authentication and tenancy boundaries baked in.

Observatorium Architecture

Core strengths

  • Platform standardization: Great for internal platforms offering “observability as a service” to many teams.
  • Governance: Per-tenant quotas, authn/z, and policy controls at the backend edge.
  • Scale-out design: Built to aggregate signal backends behind a stable API.

Watch-outs

  • Engineering investment: Requires SRE maturity to operate and evolve; UI is whatever you put in front (Grafana, etc.).
  • Procurement of pieces: You’ll still manage the underlying signal stores and upgrades.

Quick start tips

  • Pilot: Stand up a minimal multi-tenant slice for 2–3 teams; enforce quotas; measure onboarding friction and cross-team isolation.

10. Uptrace

Official Website: uptrace.dev License: AGPLv3

Architecture & signals: Tracing and metrics with distributed tracing, service maps, and alerting; self-hosted backend with optional SaaS.

Uptrace Architecture

Core strengths

  • Tracing depth: Rich span data, topology, and segment analysis.
  • Service-mesh clarity: Excellent at showing relationships, dependencies, and latency paths.
  • eBPF/mesh integrations: Insight without invasive code changes.

Watch-outs

  • Unified maturity: Logs/metrics often come via adapters; ensure the “single-pane” experience meets your bar.
  • Storage choice matters: Backing store selection shifts cost/perf characteristics.

Quick start tips

  • Pilot: Focus on a microservices slice behind a service mesh; confirm trace-to-log correlation patterns you’ll standardize.

Conclusion

In 2025, a unified open-source observability platform must deliver multi-signal visibility with cohesive queries and sane economics. Parseable leads this list for its object-store-first, columnar approach and SQL-first experience that makes large-scale exploration fast and affordable. Grafana’s ecosystem is unbeatable for breadth and visualization; SigNoz and HyperDX shine for app teams; SkyWalking and Pixie excel in K8s; VictoriaMetrics and Observatorium reward platform rigor.

A pragmatic adoption path:

  1. Pilot with dual-write on a noisy service for 2–4 weeks.
  2. Track P95 query latency, $ / TB-month, and operator hours/week.
  3. Standardize on OTel everywhere to stay portable.
  4. Lock in retention policies by signal and by environment early.

If your bias is lowest TCO + fastest ad-hoc correlation across logs, metrics, and traces, Parseable’s object-store, Parquet, and SQL-first design is purpose-built for this moment. Run a quick pilot and let the latency and storage math make the case.

Share:
See Parseable in Action

See Parseable in Action

Log in to the Demo instance to experience Parseable

Parseable Demo

Subscribe

We'll share the latest news, updates and new features on Parseable. (No spam, ever!)
Parseable
©2024-2025 Parseable, Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy